Dancing Links is a way of implementing that algorithm efficiently. The key It is largely a direct implementation from Knuth’s pdf, but with a few object orientated. Algorithm X was invented by Donald Knuth to solve it. He even suggested an efficient implementation technique called Dancing Links, using doubly-linked. I found Knuth’s “Dancing Links” paper  very well written and a somewhat easy read (I had to reread certain parts a couple times). I had to write a sudoku solver.
|Published (Last):||27 January 2004|
|PDF File Size:||14.65 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.22 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Now recursively try to solve the reduced table. Dancing Links is a way of implementing that algorithm efficiently. Guess I ought to throw some of it up on Github. It knows no difference, because pieces and cells are simply columns of the given input matrix.
Direct links to app demos unrelated to programming will be removed. I think he mentioned that it would be in his new book, but I had no idea there would be over pages of dancing links. According to Knuth, knjth links will equal or better such specifically written algorithms. This paper plays with a rather small set of concepts; I checked the wikipedia entries for the main keywords in the paper and I found them quite informative I have a CS degree.
I’m hoping to get it down to less than a second for most cases. It’s running as a rails app here: When searching for a solution, if you linls you’re going down a dead end, you undo your previous decision backtrack and try a new path – maybe undoing many decisions if you’ve tried everything where you’re at. Starting at the beginning, the very first part of the paper discusses a significant low level technique that makes back tracking in a doubly-linked list nearly free.
If the resulting matrix has no columns, then they have all been filled and the selected rows form the solution.
Then, searching for a solution is only a series of very cheap pointer twiddlings no recursion, no memory allocations necessary – hence the name “dancing links”. Is there no plugin to watch them inline? I think your dancing links is easily better considering you did hard puzzles on a 1.
It would be great if you could post your code somewhere. Email Required, but never shown.
Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms
If you can’t find a row, give up – there are no solutions. I thought I had a good grip on most of the basics of programming, and a little bit of computer science theory such as big Dxncing notationbut then I checked out this.
I’ve been curious if it’d be faster if I took that recursion out. How did I miss that? Sign up using Facebook. Now that you understand that, you can understand dancing links. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Knuth’s paper gives a clear picture of these relationships and how knurh node removal and reinsertion works, and provides a slight relaxation of this limitation.
So it sounds like grimbal’s solution is doing pretty well.
[cs/] Dancing links
The idea of DLX is based on the observation that in a knutu doubly linked list of nodes. I should have the code around here somewhere if you’re curious. Please link the abstract instead of the pdf The key point of dancing links is that in a linked list, when you remove a node which can be done efficently by modifying the pointers of its neighboursthe node that you’ve removed has all the information you need to add it back to the linked list knuuth the case that it turns out you were wrong when you guessed it was part of the solution.
Those that are interested in this ought to check out Knuth’s video lecture on the same subject, at the SCPD site: I am currently an amateur programmer in high school, teaching myself. Knuth discusses optional constraints as applied to the n queens problem.
Constraint propagation eliminates dancingg choices based on existing knowledge so they never have to be tested. I used Knuth’s dancing links algorithm to generate many of the puzzles at my website. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.